Skip to main content Backing Up macOS via Time Machine to a network SMB share : r/macsysadmin
r/macsysadmin icon
Go to macsysadmin

Backing Up macOS via Time Machine to a network SMB share

Is there a proper way to backup macOS via Time Machine to a network SMB share? I prefer to use a Windows share. If it's not possible, which OS would support Time Machine backup to a network SMB share?

Thank you.

EDIT I think I should clarify the things I have. So I have 1 Mac Mini with about 230GB used that's currently running Mojave that has APFS. I don't want to purchase additional hardware, because the hyperconverged 3-node cluster that I have has 40TB of usable space (about 1/3 of that space is used right now). With this hypercoverged 3-node cluster, I could use any Windows and Linux OS's. We set up data protection and it has its own node failover. I have a backup solution for this cluster as well. So basically, I would be backing up the Mac Mini on to a VM and then backing up the VM on to a backup drive.

I've set up the sparse bundle image and successfully backed it up via Time Machine on a Windows SMB share. Unfortunately, I was not able to restore the backup to a different Mac device that I'm testing right now.

I would like to know if there's an easier way to backup the Mac Mini without purchasing additional hardware.

Thanks again.

Great APIs aren't made alone. Postman streamlines API development, helping teams work seamlessly together to build better APIs, faster. Discover how collaboration drives success with Postman. 🤝
Clickable image which will reveal the video player: Great APIs aren't made alone. Postman streamlines API development, helping teams work seamlessly together to build better APIs, faster. Discover how collaboration drives success with Postman. 🤝
Sort by:
Best
Open comment sort options

Synology Time Machine is more stable than Apple Server Time Machine ever was.

Though I find that afp actually works better than SMB.

More replies
More replies

I spent a lot of time working on this. Basically, nope. I ended up with a virtual ubuntu box running netatalk (on hyper-v), but the share was still AFP. Scaled nicely with users, worked with quotas and AD. I've been told later version of time machine can use SMB shares (i did this 3 years ago) but haven't tested it myself. Reliability is the key. I've had marginal successes with SMB 3.0, but lots of failures where the entire backup needed to be redone. every month. which defeats the purpose of time machine, which is to allow time travel.

You can pickup an old xServe and xRAID pretty cheap used on eBay. The ability to make them a network time machine is built in.

It's also built into almost any NAS nowadays. Not to mention you can hook up drives to many routers that will also work.

Thinking most folks won't want to run a loud Xserve at their house...or in general. If you really want to go the macOS route, you could just get a mini and install Server. But if you really want to homelab it up with a 1U server...cool.

More replies
More replies
[deleted]

yes

That is an out-of-date kludge.

More replies
[deleted]

macOS by default uses SMB. Also, any Mac can now be the destination for time machine. I haven't tested this out, but that leaves me to believe that time machine works well with SMB, yes.

Please let me know what you arrive with, I'm in a near identical situation. It sounds like Ubuntu 18.04 LTS does not have the new samba 4.8 with the associated fruit extensions, but 18.10 does. I'm trying to setup an 18.10 target with the proper samba extensions this week loosely following this guide

https://www.reddit.com/r/homelab/comments/83vkaz/howto_make_time_machine_backups_on_a_samba/