Skip to main content I found research on NEGATIVE effects of pressure cooking on nutrition ... : r/Cooking

Get the Reddit app

Scan this QR code to download the app now
Or check it out in the app stores
Go to Cooking

I found research on NEGATIVE effects of pressure cooking on nutrition ...

Open Discussion

…and here’s is why I’m not going to write an article about it.

I recently found a really promising research paper that tested THIRTEEN different frozen vegetables for nutrition after boiling, pressure cooking, steaming and microwaving. Whenever I find a research paper before bearing down and reading it I always look at the data tables. Initially, I was so excited to find this jackpot of nutritional data on comparing different cooking methods on so many vegetables.

As I went through one vegetable after another, pressure cooking was either worse than or slightly better than boiling and retained VERY LITTLE folates, carotenoids, and vitamin C compared to non-pressure steaming and microwaving.

What?!?!

I was confused because this data went against EVERYTHING else I’d found so far – if true it would completely turn one of the values of pressure cooking on its head. But, it didn’t take me long to find a BIG FLAW in the data.

At the beginning of a paper, the researchers detail what equipment they used and how they measured the data. And that’s where something jumped out at me right away. For Boiling, Steaming and Microwaving the researchers instantly froze the cooked vegetable in liquid nitrogen for storage until they could measure the nutrient levels. BUT, the pressure cooked vegetables were thrown in an ice-water bath for 5 minutes first and THEN dipped in liquid nitrogen.

Hmm…. so how could this small alteration affect the results?

Well, I kept searching and found out that folates, carotenoids, and vitamin C are all WATER SOLUBLE. That means, they dissolve in water.

So, it is feasible that the pressure cooked vegetables lost additional nutrients in the ice water bath compared to all of the other cooking methods. So basically, the data on the pressure cooked vegetables is totally useless and cannot be compared to vegetables with other cooking methods that WERE NOT thrown in an ice bath for 5 minutes.

I have contacted the lead researcher to ask if they also measured the nutrients in the ice water – I haven’t heard back from them but I think it is unlikely since they did not state doing it in the paper.

I’m just putting this out there, in case anyone else stumbles on this research either thinking they found a GOTCHA and in the interest of full disclosure! If Dr. Bureau answers my query, I’ll share her response in the Hip Pressure Cooking forums (where I originally posted this text). Ciao, L

Citation: Bureau, S., Mouhoubi, S., Touloumet, L., Garcia, C., Moreau, F., Bédouet, V., & Renard, C. M. (2015). Are folates, carotenoids and vitamin C affected by cooking? Four domestic procedures are compared on a large diversity of frozen vegetables. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 64(2), 735-741.

Full Research Paper: http://prodinra.inra.fr/ft?id=C66710EF-3A38-4EF9-B349-55DE126A6457

And if you're curious to see the pressure cooker nutrition articles that I DID write, you can find them here: https://www.hippressurecooking.com/category/news-and-articles/nutrition/

Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Our *NEW* Ascent X could be under your tree. Shop models now.
Sort by:
Best
Open comment sort options

Great work exposing the anti-pressure cooking agenda! So weird why they would do this.

Edited

Thannk you. I am the original author of this article which was copy-pasted from my website for clout.

More replies

This is 9/11 with my fucking cauliflower. Crying right now

More replies

are pressure cookers...supposed to be a good way to preserve nutrients? I admit id never done research on the subject, but I always thought pressure cooking was a very intense form of cooking, meant to "break down" tough stuff in a short amount of time.

I always assumed that would also be true for nutrients, the longer/more intense the cooking is, the more nutrients break down

Profile Badge for the Achievement Top 5% Commenter Top 5% Commenter

It is higher temperature, but less time cooking. Temperature destroys some micro elements, but the faster it done, the less gets destroyed. So it could go ether way.

More replies
More replies

u/Notalabel_4566 Don't you think you should credit u/pazzaglia1 for the article you've posted, since they're the original author of this exposé?

More replies

I would like credit for my work.

[deleted]

I mean, the fundamental flaw with your reasoning is that all three of the things you mention are easily destroyed by heat, and pressure cooking is a very high heat method of cooking.

They still changed the preparation method and therefore the data are not comparable anymore.

I also think the higher temperatures of a pressur cooker played a role.

More replies

I enjoy this sub but man it gets odd sometimes, haha.... Interesting info for sure

More replies